Tommy
Thanks for your reply - it is good to get feedback as you know that you are not just talking to yourself (and being slightly mad).
The more I think about it the more I like the idea of a 'floating' set of changes in the model I have proposed. It is more natural and you just have to get the idea of use in your head. The whole concept of Box modes supporting My modes is a brilliant innovation. Perhaps we might see some more of this for other 'high level' cameras? I don't think it will catch on generally as you have to be committed to working your camera in detail and the concept does take some mental adjustment - consequently it would be more of a disincentive to anyone who just wants to switch a camera on and 'take photographs'. However the question begging to be asked is that the same 'everyone' is trying to find the camera that makes every photograph they take perfect - why then do they wish to have 'auto mode'. Probably because they are busy or mentally lazy or both - one might then wonder why they bang on about great camera IQ if they are not using their personal IQ to make their photography better? The silly part of this whole argument is that if you spend a bit of time getting your Box modes tuned (it can be fun as well) then the future use of a GRDIII with your Box settings just right for your purpose should be simplicity itself - but erase your boxes before you ever sell it or you will be handing a killer machine to the next owner (smile).
Returning to the subject: I can see no reason why Box/My mode swapping as Pavel mentioned could not co-exist with the current method of use - but I would be very sad if Box/My mode swapping replaced the current path: Test in camera -> Box mode -> My mode -> alteration in use -> My mode (or save in Box) - the whole idea is positively brilliant once you get your head around it. However if you could swap Box/My modes as well then our heads would really be in a spin until we assimilated the complexity.
I knew that the GRD had ttl metering and the R series Flashmatic. However Ricoh obviously had some sort of proprietary tweak there that allowed the camera to read exposure and adjust it to what the EV control was telling it. I agree that the EV was always lower when flash was used and therefore had to be reset for non-flash use. It was just simpler that way. Now that the GRDIII has FVC and EVC that seem to work together as you might expect ie: FVC = coarse adjustment and EVC = fine adjustment I am happy and Ricoh now throw in a manual flash control for good measure - great thinking and probably one up on the other manufacturers who 'merely' give us FVC and EVC where I am not sure if they actually talk to one another.
I am still not sure if the CX flash works the same way - a few quick tests I did said not. I will have to give it another try. Common sense says it should work: big stick / small stick as in the GRDIII. If they don't work together then one might wonder how to adjust the EVC when flash is being used.
PS if Ricoh wants me to review their firmware/cameras before release - please just send me a copy (grin).






