Carl Garrard has reviewed the GRDIII very thoroughly and I admire the amount of effort he has given in this regard.
After reading his review I did note that he had some trouble with the GRDIII's flash system.
This is an old argument dating back to the GRDI and was even brought up in relation to the R4. Guy Parsons had views on the Ricoh flash system with regard to the R4. I had mine and they were not necessaily opposed.
However there were enough moans from others about the fact that the Ricoh cameras had no Flash Value Compensation control that Ricoh effectively shoehorned such a control into the last firmware update for the GRDI. Now Ricoh includes Flash Value Compensation in all its cameras by rote.
The 'experts' who in their conventional terms relegated the EVC control to no more than an aperture/shutter speed link up seemed to be wrong but got their FVC control and went away.
It still doesn't work?
I have to go back in history for the answer.
Back in the good old days without FVC you could control the flash on the GRDI by simply moving the EV control value. This was not changing the aperature or the speed when the flash was being used as checks of the exif showed. It actually altered the amount of flash emitted.
To the point that I demonstrated to a scoffing camera shop proprietor that the pamphlet on his counter could be photogrpahed in macro from 'blown away' at +2.0 EV setting in various stages down to no flash emitted at all at -2.0 EV. How good is this - the EV control works normal EV and FVC as well - no real need for conflicting duplicated controls. But popular demand won.
In debate with Guy we worked out how the R4 worked and there was no doubt that the R4 cracked like a gun and filled the room with light at +2.0 EV and only blinked in the same conditions at EV -2.0 with all the stages in between. Guy also noted wisely the need to have the camera properly in focus to get a good light result. However there was no doubt that the R4 without FVC could control the amount of flash that was emitted by use of its EVC alone.
I have since mused at just what connection Flash Value Compensation and Exposure Value Compensation might have in the latest Ricoh cameras. My tests with the CX1 were not very conclusive - do you pull back the FVC then fine tune with the EVC? Did not get anything that seemed to make a lot of sense with the CX - perhaps I was not trying hard enough?
Carl's remarks prompted me to try the GRDIII with flash for myself. I sort of set my flash as -1.0 as if by rote as flash to me means 'fill flash' and I would otherwise not try and use it as another form of room lighting to amuse my subjects.
Therefore my camera started at -1.0 Flash Value Compensation and as the Exposure Value Compensation is 'as easy as' to adjust on the GRDIII I naturally used the EV to further adjust the image.
I was a little surprised and also gratified that the GRDIII behaved in a similar way to the original GRDI before FVC. In other words the flash metered through FVC for macro was at its reduced setting, but by reducing the EVC as well I was able to reduce the flash to no output at all (did not emit). Obviously this is the way it should work in practice.
Must try it again with the CX - I am sure that this must be the correct and expected behaviour.
In summary: it seems that the Flash Value Compensation control is the big stick power lever and the Exposure Value Compensation control is not just a signal to the sensor tweaker but can actually fine tune the amount of flash emitted when flash is being used.
There is no need to blow away your macros with the GRDIII - just turn off the big tap (FVC) a bit before you start then play with the EVC.






